Qualitative Research Assignment Essay

1. Was at that place a clear statement of the arrives of the look into ? Yes. In the article, the aim of the interrogation was to empathise the experience of actors, their cognition virtu bothy grapheme 2 diabetes, and the factors of medical specialty adherence in Malaysia. fit to Susan (2010), the tailfin comp starnts of PICOT are population, issue, context, outcome, and time. According to Al-Qazaz et al (2011), the PICOT was presented by the searcher in the fade were, P Type 2diabetes patients with receiving of hypoglycemic practice of medicine. I Identifying participants perception, and their knowledge astir(predicate) type 2 diabetes disease and medication. C USM clinic of Malaysia, where the depicted object took place.O It helps spate vivacious with type 2 diabetes to keep up a diverse understanding by relating with other peoples experiences. T March and April of 2009.Qualitative PICOT is a framework to help in formulating effective clinical question in a ste p-by step manner (Melnyk and Fineout , 2010).2. Is a qualitative methodology purloin ?Yes.Qualitative look is to think over a persons behavior and lived experiences related to what is being studied in the search (Denzin and Lincoln, 2011). The describe characteristics of qualitative take apart in this article included a small pattern size of it, in-depth converse (semi-structured), research worker involving during interview, non comparisons and non numerical. In qualitative study, sample size are usually small that achieve in-depth understanding of the experiences or feeling of the participants (Polit and Beck, 2012). Meanwhile, a semi-structured interview was use to collect info by codding participants ideas arising until no much stark naked themes emerging.According to Polit and Beck (2012), semi-structured interview commode bear rich and luxuriant nurture during phenomenon study. In this study, a phenomenological approach was utilise to draw the aim of the re search. It is to understand the experiences of diabetic patients in Malaysia, and explore their knowledge almost the medications that they pay back been winning. According to Judith (2007), qualitative research is characterized by itsaims to understand the experiences and attitudes of patients. In brief, a qualitative methodology is earmark to this research.3. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research ? Yes. According to NCBI (2014), a Phenomenological study can probably explore participants lived experience, beliefs about the efficacy of the medication, side-effects of drug and participants adherence to the treatment regime. By the square, in this article, the aim is to understand the participants experience and explore their knowledge and medication adherence related on type 2 diabetes. in that locationfore, phenomenological approach is appropriate to address the aims of the research. The advantages of Phenomenological study is to reveal patients beliefs and experiences by a flexible way to explore the respondents attitude, and allowing deep understanding about knowledge and feeling of participants (Polit and Beck, 2012). However, its demarcation subscriber line is that samples are often small band and the researchers are not attempting to popularise the findings.4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research ? Yes.The researcher recruited participants from USM clinic and who were diagnosed type 2 diabetes while taking on hypoglycemic medications through a lash-up taste. According to HRDAG (2013), convenience have is to recruit participants from a particular clinical setting during data collection of a qualitative research. Moreover, convenience sample is easy and efficient to extract the greatest possible information from the sore cases in the sample, until thither is no new data could be obtained and the verbiage of data color was achieved (Polit and Beck, 2012).However, convenience tr y out may not be a preferred sampling in qualitative research collectable to unable to bring out the most information-rich sources and the representative of the population (Polit and Beck, 2012). In this article, the data was only obtained in one specific clinic, that would affect the credibility of result, such as the adverse effects of medication, and the satisfaction rates from health submitrs. It would be better if the researcher use purpose sampling into the study.Purpose sampling is to opt participants based on specific purposes, and it is primarily used in qualitative research (Polit and Beck, 2012). it can achieverepresentativeness of the population and provide credibility of the result, because the researcher provide not only focus on one clinic during recruitment of participants.5. Were the data store in a way that intercommunicate the research issues ? Yes.A semi-structured interview was developed for data collecting of the research. Semi-structured interview is a paper-based interview guide which contain open-ended questions and the participant to follows (RWJF,2008). Moreover,Semi-structured interview provide rich, detailed information in the phenomenon study (Polit and Beck, 2012). In the study, the researcher has depict in-depth interview to explore patients beliefs and experiences. Besides, a consent form was signed by participants before interview, a call tell phone contact for recording a time of interview. Further more, all the interview has been audiotaped, and the researcher did line by line abbreviation and label the data to identify the key themes. The researcher adviseed to the participants who could not understand English during the interviewing by translating from a staff nurse to avoid bias that might affect the findings. In short, the data collected were fully addressed the research issue of this study.6. Has the blood between researcher and participants been adequately considered ? Yes. Qualitative researchers need to develop a strong alliances with participants in the study to establish credibility (Polit and Beck, 2012). In the article, all the participants were informed the purpose of this study, and a consent form was signed by each of them. The researcher overly made phone call to dress out time and place that participants would like to choose for each interview. Besides, they are allowed to pull their own views at the time of interview. From the depth psychology above we can serve the participants have been fully respected by the researcher to gain their trust.Therefore, the relationship between researcher and participants has been adequately considered in this study (Al-Qazaz et al 2011). However, there was no mention about reflexivity by the researcher in this article. According to RWJF(2008), it describe that reflexivity is a process use to interrogatory researchers relationship to the respondent that refers to how the researchers values, beliefs, acquaintances and interests m old his/herresearch. It would be better if it is mentioned about how the researcher located herself or himself in the study, the readers can identify how it affect the data obtaining, that will gain the findings of the research to be more credible (Polit and Beck, 2012).7. Have ethical issues been taken into name?Yes.In the study, a respect for human dignity was fully presented based on informing the participants about the purpose of study, distributing a consent form, and a direct phone contact before interview. The participants have been fully respected by the researcher to benefit as well as the undivideds rights. Besides, they are allowed to express their own views at the time of interview, and the participants can choose place where they feel more convenience to be interviewed. It gave researcher a chance to explore the depth-richness data from participants, and enhance the participants autonomy and anonymity in the study.Further more, the study was also approved by the loca l morals committee. In short, the ethical issues have been taken into the study as well. There was no coercion could be found in the study. However, the researcher did not mention about the confidentiality and how was data protected. Besides, they did not mention how many clock participants understanding were checked before the consent form given. According to Polit and Beck (2012), it is exposit that it must deal with ethical issues if the studies involving human beings, because the human rights must be protected.8. Was the data abstract sufficiently rigorous ?Yes. In the study, the researcher has described clearly that a transcript of 12 audiotaped in-depth interviews were double checked for its accuracy. And the researcher identified the emerging themes via line by line data analysis and coding the relevant content data into categories until the data saturation was met and no more new data emerging from the interviews. According to Polit and Beck (2012), data saturation is a measurement of sample size that based on informational demand under the study. It is to achieve the rigour of data analysis until no more new information can be obtained. However, the researcher failed to mention about member checking in this study. It is not clear whether the researcher asked participants toreview and stimulation on the case summaries or drafts of the research report. It will effect the credibility of the data. According to Polit and Beck (2012), member checking defined as the researcher confirm their data accuracy by providing a feedback to the participants during data are being collected to ensure that participants meaning were understood, and it is for enhancing validation of the research.Further more, the researcher mentioned their data were study by using means of a standard content analysis framework. Its aim was achieved by a appropriate phenomenological design in this study which have been discussed in question two. Moreover, the rigor and validity can a lso result in developing trustworthiness of qualitative research, and the five standard for evaluation the trustworthiness in the research include in credibility, dependability, confirmability, transferability, and authenticity (Polit and Beck, 2012). In the study, a phenomenological design was conducted with a semi-structured interview of data collection, and coding method for data analysis. this can be sufficiently proved its credibility, dependability, and confirmability. Therefore, it can be said the data analysis of this study is sufficient rigorous.9. Is there a clear statement of findings?Yes. Four major themes were clear give tongue to in the study which included (1). Participantsknowledge about type 2 diabetes and its medications (2). Side-effects of medications (3), adherence issues (4), relationship with family on well-being (Al-Qazaz et al 2011). According to Polit and Beck (2012), the researchers interpret the data by rereading, categorizing and coding, then developin g a data analysis to point out the themes into a unified whole. In this study, the researcher used qualitative design to consider increasingly the transferability of the findings to reflect the true experiences of the participants. It is relevancy and accurately from the data, and give reader thought to the implications of the study for future research and practice. Meanwhile, the researcher are in the best position to demonstrate their limitations what they have been aware from the study. Consequently, it told readers that the researchers have done what they could do to guarantee the findings were clearly and accurately as well.10. How valuable is the research ?The purpose of qualitative research findings was described to explore participants experiences to develop a specific nursing intervention for amend a better outcomes of patients, and as a potentially applicable recount influencing in future practice (NCBI,2011). Overview this study, a phenomenological approach that explore the aim of the research, it is to understand the experience of participants, their knowledge about type 2 diabetes, and the factors of medication adherence in Malaysia. Besides, it allows a deep understanding about knowledge and feeling of participants(Polit and Beck, 2012). Moreover, a semi-structured interview was used to provide rich and detailed information during the study for its validity(Polit and Beck, 2012).Further, a convenience sampling recruited participants and extract the greatest possible information to achieve data saturation for its rigour. Meanwhile, the ethical issues has been taken into account by the researchers to benefit as well as the individuals rights. On the other side, the researcher demonstrated their limitations what they aware of the study to enhance the findings more clearly and accurately. Regarding quantitative findings, it is not generalizable that can be applied to entire populations, however, it is generalizable in a way this particularly relev ant to nursing practice in which there is an expectation that scientific finding, and provide knowledge about human experiences to readers for future research.Thus it can be seen, the research is quite valuable.Conclusion lively appraisal is a process to seek weather a research is usefulness or its findings are trustworthy(Young and Solomon, 2009). The Critical judgement Skills Programme (CASP) produced a simple critical appraisal checklist guide people developing their skills what they need to make sense of scientific evidence(Burls, 2009). on the whole of above,by following the CASP checklist in quantitative research, it was presented a Randomized Controlled Trial Appraisal Tool, to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention , a large sample size and a blinding to achieve the reliability of the outcome and prevent bias, a intention-to-treat analysis to compromise the validity of the study. Moreover, generalizability of the study can be practices inother countries and helpful fo r further study.However, in qualitative research, the CASP is helped to understanding peoples lived experience and explore participants experience of taking the drugs, beliefs about the efficacy of the drug, side-effects and the adherence of treatment regime. A phenomenological method has been used in the qualitative study through a semi-structured interview, convenience sampling and coding to reveal patients beliefs and experiences, and allowing understanding of the knowledge and cope strategies in which the quantitative research is unable to cover. More, in this qualitative study, sample size is tend to be small, and the finding is not generalized(Polit and Beck, 2012). Both of researchers have considered validity, findings, and its relevance. However, in the qualitative article, if the researcher use a purpose sampling method and mention about reflexivity and member checking during data collection, that will enhance validity of the findings to be more accurate.Reference1. Aveyar d H and lemony P (2009) A Beginners Guide to Evidence base enforce in Health and fond Care Professions.Glasgow Open University Press.2. Al-Qazaz H, Hassali M and Sulaiman S (2011) Perception and knowledge of patients with type 2 diabetes in Malaysia about their disease and medication A qualitative study. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 7 180-191.3. Bandolier (no date) Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) lendable at http//www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/glossary/itt.html Accessed 5/92014.4. Chan Z, Fung Y and Chien W(2013) Bracketing in Phenomenology only(prenominal) Undertaken in the selective information Collection and Analysis Process?The Qualitative Report.Volume 18, phrase 59, 1-9 online Available athttp//www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/chan59.pdf(accessed 26/10/2014)5. Denzin N and Lincoln Y(Eds)(2011)The sagacious Handbook of Qualitative Research(4thedition). Thousand OaksSAGE6. Human Rights Data Analysis Group(2013) Convenience Samples What they are, and what they should (and should not) be used for online Available at https//hrdag.org/convenience-samples-what-they-are/ (accessed 3/9/2014)7. LONDON SCHOOL of HYGLENE and TROPICAL MEDICINE(no date) Qualitative methods useful for agriculture, viands and health programmes. onlineAvailable athttps//ble.lshtm.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/54407/mod_resource/content/107/ANH101/sessions/S1S2/ANH101_S1S2_040_010.html(accessed 28/10/2014)8. Melnyk B.M and Fineout-Overholt E (Eds) (2010) Evidence-Based employment in Nursing & Healthcare A Guide to Best Practice (2nd edition). UK Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.9. MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES(2007) A Guide to Using Qualitative Research Methodology online Available at http//fieldresearch.msf.org/msf/bitstream/10144/84230/1/Qualitative%20research%20methodology.pdf (accessed 28/10/2014)10. Melling A, Ali B, Scott E and cad D (2001) Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of tease infection after clean surgery a randomized controlled trial. The lan cet, 358 876-880.11. NCBI(2014) A phenomenological study to explore the experiences of Ugandan women that have undergone transvaginal ultrasound online Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175835/(accessed 1/9/2014)12. NCBI (2011) Qualitative Research Findings as Evidence avail in Nursing Practice. online Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3021785/ Accessed 13 Nov. 2014.13. Polit D and Beck C (Eds)(2011) NURSING RESEARCH Generating and assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (9th edition). UKLippincott Williams andWilkins14. Robert woods Johnson theme (2008) Qualitative Research Guidelines Project Semi-structured Interviews online Available at http//www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html Accessed 11 Nov. 2014.15. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2008) Qualitative Research Guidelines Project what is reflexivity online Available at http//www.qualres.org/HomeRefl-3703.html Accessed 12 Nov. 2014.16. Susan B.S, Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk B.M and Wil liamson K.M(2010) Asking the Clinical Question A Key step in Evidence-Based Practice. The American Journal of Nursing.Vol. 110,No.3.Available at http//www.nursingcenter.com/lnc/pdfjournal?AID=982283&an=00000446-201003000-00028&Journal_ID=&Issue_ID=(accessed 22/10/2014)