.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Pro-Peace Corps vs. No-Peace Corps

Most people dumbfound heard of the tranquillity army corps. very a couple of(prenominal) of these people real numberize that there is an anti- recreation corps sentiment. The pro- stop corps debate is that the US goernment is offering a valuable serving in ? hoboisting oppositewise countries in their teaching efforts by providing arrest workers in the fields of education, agriculture, health, trade, technology, and community development.? (? pacification corps?) This design is directed, for the well-nigh part, at recent college graduates. The anti-Peace corps affirmation is that bailiwick service programs ? ar not desireed,? and that the lust of ?paid volunteers? is an ?oxymoron.? (winter) This argument is directed al close polish uply on members of the Libertarian party. For this analysis I impart be referencing the Peace Corps web situation www.peacecorps.com. The Peace Corps is an organization that sends Ameri tin ass volunteers to 74 countries on four con trasting continents. The Peace Corps sh bes with the institution ?America?s most precious mental imagery ? its people.? The website besides says that they atomic number 18 ?devoted to arena peace and friendship.? (Peace Corps) I will alike be sustain an bind summarizing the Libertarian policy-making party?s anti- guinea pig service figure of view entitled ?What?s Wrong with National mapfulness? by Bill Winter, an editor from the publication LP News. The Libertarian party, a US political party that ?supports the rights of the individual to exercise virtual sole rootity over their deliver lives, and sets itself against the traditional services and restrictive and coercive powers of federal, state, and local anaesthetic governments.? (?Libertarian Party?) The Libertarian party is staunchly against the idea of entirely field service including the Peace Corps. The Peace Corps website hires many magniloquenceal evasive actional manoeuvres to persuade recent col lege graduates that their come is a worthy ! iodine. The site?s ethos is mainly plant by the ?.gov? that follows its URL address. password is also applied when explaining almost of the ways one quarter profit from volunteering. For example, healthcare benefits: ? encompassing health check indemnification during service widens 100% of primary feather care, hospitalization, medical evacuation, on the whole prescriptions including return control and dental care needs. Volunteers are also cover by workmans compensation for injuries incurred during their period of service,? and ? articulateness in alien languages, inter field of study experience, and cross-cultural understanding are bluely sought later on assets in nowadayss global economy.? The logic in this is that the person will have, according to the site, all medical expenses covered not and for their period of service still also for eighteen months after the volunteer has re cancelled. The volunteer will also have the reward of being able to converse con fidently in other language; witch is a valued skill amid today?s rapidly globalizing world. This might draw to anyone who has ever wished to pick out another language or to roughlyone who may have confounded a work in the past to someone who is bilingual. and the tactic employ most often is, by far, that of pathos. The emotional cost is the most obvious choice for a service-based organization?s website. If you are on the Peace Corps website it?s belike uninjured to assume that you are toying with the idea of applying. This person, the person who is not quite convinced he/she wants to join, is the person that the website is targeting. In the introduction, ?What is the Peace Corps?? it says ?Peace Corps volunteers continue to avail unmeasured individuals who want to mannikin a better biography for themselves, their children, and their community.? The said(prenominal) web surfer is going to feel all mature and fuzzy inside, thinking they could be the one to give a b etter life to that individual. In addition to many ot! her pathos appeals made throughout the website, there is also a whole section of the site, almost as big as the main site itself, devoted entirely to teens. The appeal implement in this part of the website is effly pathos based. This section is stressful to show teens how cool and fun the Peace Corps piece of tail be. It includes things like music from around the world, easy recipes from other countries, and a ?What?s Your Peace Corps Style?? quiz to severalise you what kind of degree you might want to get in college so you can serve in that field. Seeing as how you have to have a college degree to join up, this is a clear attempt to get a younger travail cheered long before it is time to thrust the finding to apply. In accordance with the Libertarian mindset this is a major problem. The rhetorical tactics used in this denomination are loosely word of honor; in addition, the author seems to ?reveres? ethos (attempt to discredit the opposing side, or condense the opp onent?s ethos.) The topic of the author?s own ethos is not even touched upon because this phrase appeared in a libertarian publication. The author makes an assumptive claim of credibility by constitution of the fact that he (presumably) shares the same political affiliations as the reader. The use of logos can be seen in all the be and percentages that are given when talking about how ?politicians can?t grasp the notion and Americans don?t need to be bribed or blackmailed into volunteering.? The author states ?that 48% of Americans volunteer each year.? (Winter)The article itself makes reference to rhetoric when talking about prexy Clinton?s encouragement of more volunteerism. Clinton gave a speech in 1997 where he said Americans ?owe a debt of service? and have ?an arrangement to give something back to the country and community.
Ordercustompaper!   .com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
? (qtd in Winter) The article states that his annunciation ?eerily echoed the rhetoric of some of autobiography?s belabor despots?, and ?by the late 1990?s such rhetoric had turned into justnessfulness.? (Winter) This is in reference to the fact that in parliamentary law to graduate most high instructs you must now complete a community service requirement. This further backs up the article?s logos that ?Voluntary service programs can be a stepping stone to non-voluntary programs.? (Winter) One major sprain ethos tactic was used while trying to discredit these mandatory tutor service programs:Ironically, while government schools are busy forcing students to build picnic tables and raise money to buy bulletproof vests for law of nature dogs (both real projects), they are failing in their primary legation: T o educate students. According to the 2000 National Assessment of fosterage gain ground report, about one of four high school students are functionally illiterate when they graduate. They know how to serve, exclusively not how to read. (Winter)Another reverse ethos tactic used to discredit the supporters of national service was when the author drew a connection between the current US government and Nazi Germany. This is done by comparing some of the things that volunteerism advocates have said to the Nazi shibboleth ?Germeinnutz vor Eigennutz? (?The common interest before self.?) That?s a truly powerful statement. Winter makes light of the current establishment all throughout his article, referring to them at one point as ?national service cheerleaders.? However this connection with what is considered one of the worst moments in human history may be interpreted as a real stretch and distract his readers. Both sides make excellent use of rhetorical tactics for their corresponding audiences, but neither one ever targets the opponent! ?s audience. I believe that the vitrine style Winter writes in, while humorous at times, would deport most people to regard the Libertarians as in like manner extremum and cause them to move to the pro-national service side. The Peace Corps website on the other hand presents their argument with a aim head. I believe that a Libertarian with a weak settlement could be persuaded that national service, or the Peace Corps at the very least, is not so bad after all. determine CitedLibertarian Party. cyclopaedia Britannica. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. 18 Feb. 2008 . Winter, Bill. Libertarian Solutions: Whats Wrong with National Service. LP News 20 Jan. 2004. 18 Feb. 2008. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment