Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on coordinate and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe changing nature of engineering has induced m all studies on the relation between engine room and authorities or musical arrangemental coordinate to be more particular proposition . As technology evolves from one take of sophistication to a higher(prenominal) level , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and veridical to the environment belowgoes changes . It withal follows naturally that much(prenominal) wide-ranging changes atomic add up 18 bound to be reflected in the organization mental synthesis also . The question here is - to what extent does technology simulate or determine organization structure ? The three studies under devotion take radically different stands on the burn . age `The Management of Innovation by Burns stalker (1961 ) asserts that changing technology and securities industry conditions define the trouble organisation of each organization , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very minimal deed on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , but combines with opposite contextual dimensions such as size , to exert a intercourse cast on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in ` general Accidents , supporting with high-risk Technologies , on the another(prenominal) hand , contends that the put level of sophistication and complexities in technologies absorb led to a authority in which organization structures , however developed or adapt they may be to the changing technological situations , argon unavailing to cope with or handle systems with `interactive complexities and unwaveri! ng couplingIn some ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to play in the make of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost unpromptedly determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control out of the hands of human races gentleman and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and undercover to the intellect of human beings . Pugh however attributes senior management with asexual capacity to alter the structure of an organization by as much as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations hold up be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to ad-lib shaping organization structure . It is management that will scram to understand the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to solvent and adapt effectively to changing environments . The human management moving compevery has to play a decisive and deliberate role in defining and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations taking into consideration not only the technological survey but also all other factors that could affect the organization structureThe optimal or ideal organization structure for any technology situation could in all p! ossibilities not be the standard or...If you want to get a full essay, play club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper